This tag was created by Anonymous.
Claims for damages examined by the Comptroller, July 23
All five stories reported that 106 claims had been filed for damages totaling $116,000. The New York World-Telegram and New York Amsterdam News added the detail that the sums claimed ranged from $2.65 to $14,000. An additional sixty-five claims had been rejected as they had been filed more than the thirty days after the disorder, the period allowed in section 71 of the General Municipal Law, according to the New York World-Telegram and New York Amsterdam News. Only the New York World-Telegram identified six insurance companies as among the plaintiffs, seeking to recover what they had paid to the business owners with policies covering their broken windows - reported earlier as $147,315. The New York World-Telegram, New York Sun and New York Amsterdam News stories described the city's response, filing a "general denial" of all the claims that meant they would be resolved in court. The claim published in the New York World-Telegram that the full calendar of the court would delay trials until the next year proved accurate only for the Supreme Court: two cases were tried in the Municipal Court, in September and November.
The claims filed by Rosenstein asserted that the police department provided "insufficient protection" to the stores and that the police on the scene were "inefficient in handling the mob," phrases quoted in both the New York Sun and the New York World-Telegram, and paraphrased in the New York Amsterdam News. Rather than quoting from the claims, the New York Post story described them as charging "police laxity" and used them as the basis for taunting the city's police: "Where were those tough, hard-boiled cops when a riot broke out in Harlem, March 19? Why did they forget then that swaggering aggressiveness which pickets and soapboxers know so well?" By contrast, taking the other side in the ongoing tension between Mayor La Guardia and the police department, the New York Sun blamed the Mayor's "kid-glove methods" for the failed police response: "While scenes of terror rocked the Negro section during most of the late afternoon and night, Mayor La Guardia persisted in his attitude that things would come out alright, that the police had the situation in hand. His attitude, it was apparent, was responsible for the comparative gentleness with which the situation was handled by the cops."
The stories quoted testimony from several business owners. Only Harry Piskin was mentioned in all five stories, in part because he claimed the largest sum for damages, but also because he recounted being refused help by police on three occasions. George Chronis, Manny Zipp, Avitable and Stetkin each featured in three stories, Zelvin in two stories, and Harry Levinson in only one story. The WT provided the most testimony, from six business owners (Avitable, Piskin, Chronis, Zipp, Zelvin, Stetkin), with five quoted in the NYS (Piskin, Levinson, Stetkin, Avitable, Zipp) and NYP (Chronis, Stekin, Zipp, Avitable, Piskin), and two in the AN (Piskin and Chronis) and NYEJ (Piskin and Zelvin).
[How many of the seven instances of looting appeared in any other sources? Not Zipp, Piskin] [How many not in original 20 = Chronis, Zipp / in original 20 = Piskin
This page has tags:
Contents of this tag:
This page references:
- "106 Suits Filed Under Mob Law in Harlem Riot," New York World-Telegram, July 23, 1935 [clipping]
- "Harlem Riots to Cost Dearly," New York Sun, July 23, 1935 [clipping]
- "Cops not on Job, Say Harlem Suits," New York Post, July 23, 1935 [clipping]
- "Riot Victims Ask Relief," New York Evening Journal, July 23, 1935 [clipping].
- "106 Shop Owners Ask $116,000 Riot Losses," New York Amsterdam News, July 27, 1935, 1.
- "Riot Glass Loss $147,315," New York Times, March 30, 1935, 17.